Good morning.
How ironic (and shrewd) that tomorrow, just in time for “the tipping point of September,” IraqSlogger would erect a flowah-insurmountable ($60 per month!) subscription wall. I’m not sure what this will do to my efforts to keep you informed — slow them down some, I imagine, add a little more spottiness than before, probably — but I’m certainly going to miss Slogger’s invaluable help in finding the pattern of things.
Today, though, as the editors of NYT observe, that pattern is indelible:
Mr. Bush has invoked Vietnam to argue against leaving Iraq. That argument is specious, but there is a chilling similarity between the two American foreign policy disasters. In Vietnam, as in Iraq, American presidents and military leaders went to great lengths to pretend that victory was at hand when nothing could be farther from the truth.
Even as we KNOW we’re being lied to, the liars redouble their efforts. Yesterday emptywheel ticked off the various reports “that have come and will come in the next month”:
– “the Petraeus White House report,”
– the (reportedly Petraeus)-”softened” NIE,
– an independent study by ex-Marine general James Jones (“Who knows how they’ll try to ’soften’ this report? Already, though, Anthony Cordesman has been predicting the report will deliver bad news, perhaps (as with this GAO report) to pre-empt any ’softening’ of the conclusions by the military”),
– and the leaked-to-WaPo GAO report itself.
As emptywheel sighed on our behalf, “Well, the propaganda has gotten so thick that now, when people liberate reports to ensure their harsh conclusions see the light of day, they tell you they are doing so.”

