UPDATE: I posted a mistake here. The judge took the motion to sever under advisement.
The motion for a change of venue was denied. More later.
UPDATE: I posted a mistake here. The judge took the motion to sever under advisement.
The motion for a change of venue was denied. More later.
February 21, 2008 at 6:12 pm |
Soooo, this leaves us with… wiretaps? Is that the only thing still left on the table?
February 21, 2008 at 6:15 pm |
I believe that he has not ruled on the other crimes or the warrants. I think both are under advisement. Wanted more info from both sides to be submitted Monday as I recall.
February 21, 2008 at 6:15 pm |
Daily Journal has this quote regarding Biggers on venue:
“He said while it has presented probably the most thorough briefing he’d ever read, there was not any information in there that indicated to him how many people may have been influenced or have read any of these stories about the case in the state or the region.”
February 21, 2008 at 6:29 pm |
Hmm, MT 3.
See, Keker, we tol’ ya — we ARE chopped livah!
February 21, 2008 at 7:45 pm |
I just posted details from the hearing
February 21, 2008 at 8:16 pm |
Yes yes … Bloggers Unite!
February 21, 2008 at 10:12 pm |
Hey Tom: remember the “we could send delaughter a memorandum on a paper napkin e-mail?” there’s a link to Zach!
February 21, 2008 at 11:37 pm |
confounded, I was really surprised the government didn’t mention that.